http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php en-us Sun, 05 Sep 2010 09:46:34 +0100 Sun, 05 Sep 2010 09:46:34 +0100 SoftCab.com http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=80 Managing Change in Austere Times]]> Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:39:01 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=80#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=79 This morning I listened to a chilling telephone phone-in, on BBC Radio 5-Live, regarding the fact that several thousand people have joined a Facebook ‘campaign’, entitled RIP Raoul Moat You Legend.
The first point to be made is that that is not entirely inaccurate. The dictionary definition of ‘legend’ describes a story passed down (through generations). I think it is entirely possible that that may well be Moat’s legacy so, the title of the Facebook page may be reasonable. What would not be reasonable would be any suggestion that Moat was to be applauded for his actions.
The reason that the phone-in was so chilling was two-fold. Firstly, some callers gave the impression that Moat was some-kind of comic-book hero, for single-handedly escaping capture and bringing embarrassment to the Police. Let’s be clear here, if Moat gunned down his ex-partner’s boyfriend and then shot a police officer, he is nothing but a cold-blooded killer. Only the most misguided will call him a hero.
Second reason for the phone-in being chilling was because of the vicious verbal attacks on our police-force; it is, however, essential that government take seriously the fact that many people feel disenfranchised from those serving to protect us all. The reasons for this must be analysed and addressed, otherwise we are on a slippery-slope.
These verbal attacks were predominantly because of what was seen as the deployment of excessive force. Now, I accept that we will all be characterised by our life experiences but, coming only weeks after the Derrick Bird rampage in Cumbria, I think it entirely proportionate for the Police to garner as many resources as they did, in order to limit the risk of another blood-bath.
One caller suggested that he knew that Moat would not have been so indiscriminate. Easy to say, not so easy to believe when you have responsibility for the public’s safety; and, I’m pretty sure that associates of Bird would have said exactly the same thing about him, before events unfolded there.
This brings me to my main point – responsibility. One caller, this morning, suggested that the Government was at fault because they take your jobs, encourage you to drink and gamble and then, when you go off the rails, they want to kill you. I’m afraid that this went completely over my head. I may be more fortunate than most but, I fail to see how anyone, thinking rationally, can come up with such a bizarre outlook on life!
An earlier caller suggested that he thought that Moat’s actions in shooting the policeman may have been proportionate but, when asked if he would have felt differently if the deceased had been the caller’s brother, his response was ‘yes’. Completely irrational thinking, and these people are allowed to vote!
Another caller this morning suggested that the authorities had made mistakes by not reacting quickly enough to reports about the threats that Moat had made; to which another caller asked whether it was the Prison Officer’s fault then? The first caller replied by saying “why not? It has to be someone’s fault.” Dead right – it was Raoul Moat’s fault! End of debate.
There may have been contributory factors but, this whole sorry episode was the fault of one person - Raoul Moat; no-one else.
When, oh when, are the public going to grasp that they are responsible for their own actions? If you do not want a nanny-state, take some goddamn responsibility.]]> Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:18:31 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=79#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=74 Now, before I go any further, I would say that the performance was so bewilderingly bad that the only acceptable explanation would be akin to the experience of the Brazilian team, just prior to the 1998 final, when Ronaldo suffered a seizure. It may yet come out that something untoward went on in the England camp (God forbid it be anything quite so serious); otherwise, I am afraid to say that last night was nothing short of a disgrace. The team and manager must accept that they deserve every bit of criticism coming their way.
I am not an advocate of booing, as it seems a puerile way of expressing your feelings but, Wayne Rooney, on this occasion you were out of order. I certainly would never condone supporters booing their own team during a game for a poor performance but, they had every right to do so, afterwards, last night. Some of those supporters had spent good money to go to South Africa to watch and they were treated to an inept shambles.
Our players are multi-millionaires as a result of their talent; most of us are struggling in the face of the recession and, quite frankly, we deserve better from those who are fortunate enough to earn rich reward for representing their country. They do have a responsibility to both show and, generate in us, some pride. We got neither! So, take the criticism on the chin, Mr Rooney, as I think we are owed an apology, not you whinging like a little baby!
Having said that, I will be fully behind the team once more, on Wednesday, as there is still a chance to turn it all around but, nothing short of a semi-final appearance will atone for such abject failure to perform so far.
I recall, a decade ago, saying to friends and family that English players are technically inferior; a point proven by Algeria last night, who were all more comfortable on the ball. I’ve heard players denying that but, I don’t think they understand the true meaning of the word. Yes, they may understand and respond well to the tactics employed by coaches and, utilise modern technology to improve fitness through diet and recovery from injury but, their technique is regularly found wanting.
Take last night, Kevin Keegan commented that England’s only real scoring opportunity had fallen on Frank Lampard’s wrong foot. Good grief! I could easily swear in response because, I simply cannot accept that as any sort of explanation, let alone excuse. I could kick equally well with both feet so, why can’t someone who earns a fortune for doing nothing but kicking a ball be able to do it? Answer; we are too arrogant in this country to realise that we are light-years behind the rest of the world in technique.
It’s like this bloody nonsense about not practising penalties, because you cannot replicate the tension. So, why is it that Johnny Wilkinson is able to kick goal kicks for fun in Rugby? Because he practices! Funny that; as he cannot practice in front of 50,000 people every day. No, he grooves his technique so that in the face of tension, he has a much higher chance of coping with it. It’s not rocket science, for God’s sake.
If we are ever to aspire to win anything again we need a sea-change of approach; why can’t those ‘in the game’ see it? In those last 10 years, we have won the Rugby Union World Cup and, earlier this year, a world cricket trophy. Why can we do it in those sports? Because the whole infrastructure is geared towards a successful national team. Not in Football, the clubs rule the roost and, most of the top teams are full of overseas players. Not good for our team.
Some argue that our top players develop by playing against other top players. Maybe so but, because overseas players are filling our club-sides, we have not the strength in depth and, as a result, those that are in the England team know there aren’t many good enough to replace them. They become complacent.
Going back to the ‘change of approach’, this needs to begin at absolute grass-roots and get away from the parents instilling a ‘must-win’ attitude. Instead, youngsters need to be given the freedom to enjoy the game and develop natural skills, not work-rate; that can easily come later when they are physically stronger. They need to be rewarded for being gifted at controlling, passing, beating players and shooting.
We claim that the English game is built upon hard-work and industry but, what happens when that doesn’t work? We have no alternative. The Brazilians, on the other hand, are more naturally gifted but, if they found that not to work in any particular game, they can resort to hard-work; we don’t have an option. Just huff and puff!
Talking of Brazil; it has been suggested that our players may not have coped with the pressure. Well, if that’s the case then they don’t deserve to play again. England cannot be under more pressure than the Brazilians, because every tournament they are expected to win…by everyone in the World. Most of their players seem to cope with the pressure, because more often than not they get to the Final! Why? Because they are confident that their technique will allow them to cope with most situations.
If I was Capello, on Wednesday, I would replace the entire team from last night to get the message through that it was simply unacceptable; and say to the alternative eleven go out and show me some pride and take your chance with both hands.
Can’t see it happening but, come on England!]]> Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:41:05 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=74#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=73 How small-minded can you get? Isn't this exactly what has been wrong with politics recently, parties have embarked upon petty points scoring by deriding anything they see as wrong with another party? What they should be doing is telling the electorate what are the benefits of voting for their party.
So, once again, I stress this may be a turning point in British politics, not only may we get a ground-breaking government but, we might actually get a grown-up general election next time; fought in the mind, rather than the playground!]]> Thu, 13 May 2010 22:47:58 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=73#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=72 My frustration was not lessened until yesterday evening, when news of the coalition emerged. I find this exciting news, not least because of the parties involved. Why?
Well, political idealism has been proven to not work all over the world. Whether it be right-wing dictatorships, or hard-line communism, none have endured really sustained levels of success...however, that be measured!
Having some of the greater intellects from two of our main political parties working closely together may signify a ground-breaking move in British politics. There is much hard-work to be done but, I honestly believe we stand on the brink of a major opportunity to move this country forward...and upwards. The temptation of power has long since proven a human failing so, the politicians involved may yet weaken and let individual desires over-ride national good. But, let's hope that that opportunity is recognised and grasped by all concerned.
As for the electorate, we need to be a little patient. I suspect that that may be asking too much. I live in hope!]]> Wed, 12 May 2010 17:42:35 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=72#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=71 Jack's Cycle Ride]]> Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:28:53 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=71#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=70 Apparently, after taking the keys from his sleeping mother’s handbag, Thomas Chatfield managed to reverse, yes reverse (!), the vehicle off the drive before embarking on his epic journey, mainly along country roads near Chichester.
That manoeuvre alone makes him a pretty competent driver but, it is said that passers-by were alerted by his erratic driving.
Erratic? In what way? Maybe he was indicating when turning? That would have made him stand-out, because that’s more than most adult drivers manage to achieve!]]> Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:32:56 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=70#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=69 Exceeding Expectation: the principles of outstanding leadership
Click on the link to download the report. After 2 years of extensive research, the results show that people-centric leadership is proven to be the most effective way to successful business results.
It is well worth a read.]]> Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:39:34 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=69#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=68 Example 1) Reports coming out of the Iraq War Inquiry seem to be indicating that we were misled by our Prime Minister, Tony Blair, as to the reality of the situation in that country. If that proves to be the case, then it is an outrage that someone in such a position would abuse the trust placed in them.
Example 2) Families of victims of the July 7 bombings in London have been treated to the prospect of having to face the Inquest alongside the families of the spineless murderous bombers; the lawyer due to head the Inquest claiming that their hands are tied. Garbage! Those responsible should take a long hard look at themselves, for treating the relatives of those cruelly lost in the atrocities with such disdain.
Example 3) It transpires that members of the management team from the Phoenix Group, who took over MG Rover, milked millions and millions of pounds from the business, before it went bust and many people lost their jobs. These people are as spineless as the London bombers, and then they have the temerity to offer to repay just a few million. How magnanimous of them! I don’t know how they sleep at night!
Example 4) This one takes the biscuit! The Catholic hierarchy in Ireland was granted immunity, to cover up child sex abuse among paedophile priests in Dublin. I need say no more; collusion between the police and the church to cover up such abhorrent crimes. As well as the police, the whole Catholic Church should hang their heads in shame. Their very existence is built upon the premise that we should adopt Christian virtues and do the right thing. Really? Why should we ever again pay attention to any one of its leaders – a travesty of language in the circumstances?
So, there we have it. Government, the Judiciary, the Police, the Church and Business leaders, all guilty of an abuse of position, and failing those that they serve. Indeed, some of those institutions are looked up to, by members of the public, for guidance and strength. I’m afraid the moral backbone is broken and, until we get some real leadership from someone, the future does indeed look bleak!]]> Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:01:16 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=68#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=67 Everyone is talking about the programme, and it dominates the day-time media. I have just listened to two members of the public rowing, on a radio talk-in, about Jack Straw’s father. Wonderful! The significance of that is not in its subject matter but, in the mere fact that passions have once again been aroused; the importance of that should not be under-estimated. It is crucial that we, as a nation, are not allowed to become apathetic.
However, what disturbs me is that our senior politicians are still failing to comprehend the subliminal message which, I believe, is being sent by those who do protest-vote for the BNP. That message is that people, generally, are fed-up of feeling marginalised by globalisation and that our elected members of parliament are failing to appropriately inform, consult and represent us on key issues.
It is, in fairness, a two-way street. If we do not as a body of people show an interest in politics – turn-outs of fewer than 50% in any election is frankly pathetic – then we do not deserve good quality representation. However, in return for our engagement, we should be entitled to our representatives displaying leadership, integrity and moral fortitude.
This is where I feel last night’s programme was a missed opportunity. Once again we were treated to a session of politics with no substance, because the modus operandi was to attack others – predominantly on this occasion Griffin and the BNP. When is a politician going to have the backbone to display the characteristics that I have just mentioned and tell us what their party is actually going to do to help us recover from this recession, get people back to work, address the failing health and education programmes and properly tackle law and order?
As a result, being a supporter of no particular party, those on the panel from our three major parties did nothing to grasp the nettle and tell me why I should vote for them next year. Political activists need to learn the lesson fast; otherwise this newly-generated passion will soon be lost again. Carpe Diem!]]> Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:45:56 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=67#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=66 Can I pass on a sincere 'thank you' to all who have purchased The phat Controller.
The follow-up is coming together, as is the novel, so watch this space.]]> Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:25:08 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=66#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=65 Follow the Phat Controller on Twitter.
Each week, on phat Friday, catch a leadership snippet at ControllerPhat on twitter.com]]> Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:33:15 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=65#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=61 The case in the US now bears the familiar ring about whether the ‘authorities’ had acted appropriately enough in the past. And rightly so; lessons should always be learnt from such circumstances, in an effort to minimise the risk of repetitions.
In recent years in the UK we have had the Victoria Climbie case and, lately, baby Peter Connelly. What concerns me, though, is whether enough is done to help the ‘authorities’ do a thorough job. Those ‘authorities’ are our public servants in government, civil service, local government and the emergency services.
Pieces of legislation such as the Human Rights Act and the Data Protection Act seem, to me, to serve only to frustrate the authorities by tie-ing one hand behind their back; doing more to protect perpetrators of crime, rather than the victims.
I have witnessed examples of people complaining that they have been mistaken for a debtor, and yet the regulating body seems more concerned about the fact that the debtor’s rights have been infringed through disclosure, rather than the complainant. Is it just me?
As I said before, if we want to enjoy the benefits of living in a civilised society, then there is a cost to that – taxes, both government and local. In order to protect those benefits, on all levels, we need an efficient judiciary system.
Clearly it is essential that the innocent are protected, and security measures such as the Government Connect process in the UK can only be applauded. However, I struggle to understand why there is no proper joining up of information that could be made available to public service. Why are local authorities, for instance, not permitted to share data held within the DWP and HMRC?
Instead, it appears to be condoned for people to ‘duck and weave’, hiding from their responsibilities, comforted in the knowledge that somewhere a lawyer will fancy making their name (and a fast buck) by defending them. This all places greater burdens upon the rest of us, as a result.
I know that Orwell’s 1984 was a warning, not a blue-print, but more effective joining up of information would empower public bodies to see a bigger picture. As opposed to simply remaining in their silos ticking boxes - brought about by cutting corners in the target-driven culture, from which we are struggling to break free.
Of course, as well as acting upon it, comes a duty to appropriately protect such information. Both require our civic leaders to facilitate, through strong leadership.
Only when all of this is in place will we minimise the risk of the UK experiencing a Josef Fritzl, or Phillip Garrido. Of course, God forbid, we may already be too late and we just don’t know it yet!]]> Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:27:38 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=61#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=60 Click the link: The new VauxWagon T'0ssa]]> Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:08:04 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=60#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=59 However, I must apologise for slowing his work, if our good Lord’s off-spring was a passenger in the black BMW flashing his headlights at me on the A34 – he could not possibly have been the driver, displaying such boorish behaviour! If it were he, I wonder if he wouldn’t mind having a quiet word with the cretin who was behind the wheel? I was in an ‘average speed monitoring’ zone, sticking to the speed limit, as was the car in the inside-lane parallel to me. Quite where this moron expected me to go when he was closer to me than the shirt on my back, I do not know; miracles are not my thing!]]> Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:06:08 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=59#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=56 But, is that not the way life is? We all have to make choices without really knowing what is around the corner for us. The participants in BGT do so willingly; they are not coerced into something that they would rather not do. I even heard some commentators arguing that we should not find entertaining, people who make themselves look foolish. Why not? That is exactly why some of the auditionees do it – to get their 5 minutes of fame on the TV!
Television’s primary objectives are two-fold – inform or entertain; BGT certainly does the latter. If this programme is forced into reconsidering its very existence because its contributors are unprepared for their destiny, then should the same not apply to the National Lottery? Multi-million pound winners are not prepared for such wealth! Where would the argument end – ban libraries because users are not prepared for the limitless knowledge they can inherit? Clearly nonsense and why, I would ask, should we be prevented from ever having the chance to hear talent such as Paul Potts? There was no hysterical over-reaction when he was plucked from obscurity!
Get a grip, Britain. If we are concerned of the effects that life-changing events can have on people’s mental health, can I suggest that we take it really seriously? Let’s start checking whether people have the mental capacity to have children. I think that allowing the likes of Karen Matthews, and the mother of Baby P, to have children whenever they so choose, and without regulation, is of much greater concern than whether BGT is out of control.]]> Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:16:39 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=56#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=55 Then we had the NHS opening itself up to criticism, as a result of poor standards of care in some of its hospitals such as Stafford; and the police force under investigation due to the actions of some of its officers, during the demonstrations at the recent G20 summit in London.
We now find our MP’s pilloried for some of the outrageous, immoral and, quite frankly, fraudulent expenses claims. Although I don’t think that an MP’s salary is adequate for the responsibility and commitment that the position demands - that is a discussion for another day - this is no excuse for appalling standards of ethics and poor leadership from our current politicians.
All of this against the backdrop of the deepest recession in modern history. A sorry mess!
As things stand, the general public must have little, or no, respect for those in public office. This is very unfair on the many individuals employed within public service that do retain the requisite levels of integrity. However, perception is reality and this week’s revelations on MP’s expenses have plunged us to new depths of improper behaviour.
I am not normally an advocate of knee-jerk reactions but, occasionally radical action is required. Now is one of those times, I believe. We need to send a strong, decisive and determined message to the general public that, not only do we expect the best level of public service, anything less is unacceptable. We must start at the top and let that public have its say – nothing short of an immediate general election would be satisfactory.
I would then like to see a really fresh start and our political leaders demonstrating tangible leadership, by actually working together for the greater good of the UK, not trying to make political gain by mocking opponents who may be struggling to come to terms with the difficulties being faced.
This may sound a little naïve and idealistic, but is it not time that we started making fuller use of what sets us apart from the animal kingdom – our brain?]]> Sun, 17 May 2009 16:27:22 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=55#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=54 Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:38:40 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=54#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=51 Personally, I do not see why we do not retain a DNA sample of all babies born, from this day forward. Clearly, not all crimes can be solved through DNA but, a significant number can be, making it worthwhile taking these samples at birth.
For one, it will save an enormous amount of taxpayers money through reduced time spent on crime detection but, more importantly, it will help the families of victims of some crimes. This is something that I fear we pay insufficient regard to; instead worrying ourselves that these perpetrators are protected. However, I can hear the Human Rights lobby now, screaming that this would be an excessive and unnecessary retention of data.
Unnecessary? Since when has it been unnecessary to ensure that the correct perpetrator of a crime is brought to justice? Since when has it been unnecessary to ensure that people are not sentenced for crimes that they did not commit? Since when has it been unnecessary to minimise the heartache caused to the families of crime victims?
I’m sorry but, I thought that the Human Rights Act was there to prevent innocent people becoming unnecessary victims of ill-conceived acts by others, not to protect the perpetrators of evil crimes? For me, once you commit crimes of such magnitude you lose your human rights and I would willingly give a DNA sample tomorrow, if asked, as I have nothing to hide.
It goes without saying that Miss de Simone and Mr Hodgson are the real victims in cases such as the one to which I refer but, their families have suffered immeasurably. Using a bank of DNA, as I urged above, would minimise the risk of such a miscarriage happening again. This view is only re-inforced when I hear psychologists claiming that the Josef Fritzl’s of this world are born to commit their crimes! How scary is that?]]> Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:15:58 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=51#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=50 This news swiftly follows last night’s BBC Documentary, ‘Vodka, Homework and Me’, focusing on children drinking alcohol. It cannot even be termed as being about teenage drinkers as, astonishingly, one of the featured children was just ten-years-old and who frequently drank significant amounts of Vodka.
What dawned on me, whilst watching this, was just how society had changed during my lifetime. Change is inevitable but, one hopes that it is mostly for the better. With this particular issue, it clearly has not been a good change. When I was young, it felt like a high proportion of schoolchildren were receiving appropriate guidance from their parents; this was re-inforced by the school ‘system’.
Unfortunately, over the intervening years, it seems that parental responsibility has diminished – a reflection, no doubt, of society in general where everyone seems to want to blame someone, or somebody, else for any problems – and those in the education system rendered powerless, prevented by government intervention from playing a role.
The programme highlighted the importance of charity projects, such as The Glaciere in Liverpool, that assist youngsters in finding a focus in life and setting them on the ‘straight and narrow’.
I’m sorry, but laudable as that is, surely we have got it all wrong? The responsibility for guiding young people naturally falls to, and MUST be that of, parents - re-inforced through the education system. Why should the general public have to pay four times over for our youngsters to be properly ‘attuned’ for life. We pay National Insurance to contribute to the Welfare State, which provides benefits for families to have children. We pay Income Tax AND Council Tax, which contribute to funding of the Education system. And, since none of that seems to be working properly, we are then expected to fund charities, through donations and the National Lottery, to do the job that parents and teachers are best placed to do. Sheer lunacy!
It is high time that the Government got to grips with this issue, and they can start by paying heed to the Cambridge University’s Primary Review. Society must also play a part by taking responsibility for our own lives and our children’s.]]> Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:08:07 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=50#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=48 Word is that the groundstaff warned the cricketing authorities, back in November, that it would not be ready in time for this high profile game to take place.
If this is true, then those administrators should pay heavily for their incompetence. Some people have saved a lot of money and planned their holiday from the UK to take in this match, as it was due to be played on an idyllic Caribbean island.
It is, perhaps, a perfect illustration of managers and leaders falling into that perennial trap of thinking they know better, ignoring the advice of those best placed to give it: the people doing the job!
When, oh when, will this lesson be learnt?
If you wish to read more on this subject, click on this link and purchase my book: The phat Controller (A Leadership Handbook)]]> Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:57:20 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=48#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=43 Let us not forget that we were first to have a woman leader but, some of those interviewed suggested that it might be several generations before we experience a non-white Prime Minister.
Given that the USA is overtly more racist than the UK, it begs the question as to why we might have to wait so long. Observers have remarked that Obama is a ‘special’ man and, if there is to be only one such man, then the law of probability means that he is more likely to be found in a country with a population of 304m, than in a country with a population of 61m.
However, I think the reasoning is more profound than that. It is a question of attitude. Generalisations are never good but, the aspirations of Americans always seem greater than we Brits. We always seem so keen to promote the underdog, whilst the Americans love a winner. Here, it is perceived as cool to be one of the ‘masses’ and it feels like people are not prepared to work hard to achieve, they would rather have celebrity status thrust upon them.
We cannot all be celebrities; so my challenge to the UK populace, of all creeds, is to find that inner-drive to succeed. Find the will to achieve your dreams, the strength to ride the storms and the wisdom to capture your opportunities.
And for those who say, “It’s a waste of effort, I can’t do it.” I quote: “Yes you can!”]]> Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:25:01 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=43#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=42 Manchester City are now considered to be cash-rich with a Saudi Arabian benefactor. If this were happening at my club I would be so excited and I understand City fans feeling the same. However, what gets me about all this is, if they have so much money, why not reduce the ticket prices and the cost of replica kits? This would instantly give something to the real fans and would hardly be noticed in the accounts. Will it happen? I doubt it. Will Manchester City buy themselves success? I doubt it. Will football ever see sense? I doubt it!]]> Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:53:22 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=42#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=41 Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:20:27 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=41#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=40 There may have been some unforgiveable lapses and oversights in procedure, by a number of people. These should not be swept under the carpet but, let us be perfectly clear here, the ONLY people responsible for the death of Baby P are the perpetrators of this heinous crime. I am fed up of listening to how other people can be found to be responsible for the actions of the irresponsible.
As a supposed ‘advanced’ race we sometimes do little to confirm that view. Until people start taking responsibility and stop behaving like our cousins in the animal kingdom, the only option is to treat those who transgress accordingly. That ends, yes, with much stronger punishment for crimes but, that is a discussion for another day.
The current topic is the sad case of Baby P. Let us start to address the cause of such cases, rather than trying to treat the symptoms. We need licenses to get married, to drive, to fish, to have a dog, to have a television. Is this not, yet another, example of why it is time that we should have to be licensed to have children? We should be subject to the most rigorous of testing when applying, to assess suitability. Let me know what you think?
Such a dramatic step would help minimise the risk of any young children becoming yet another victim of the ‘great unwashed’. Human rights! I can hear the call now. So, where are Baby P’s human rights? “I rest my case, your honour!”]]> Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:00:17 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=40#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=39 phat Controller out to as many places as possible. If you would like details on any of the events below or, book me for any speaking or signing engagements, please contact my publicist at moominskiesselle@madasafish.com
Dates booked so far:
18 November 2008 Bristol
28 November 2008 Nottingham
8 December 2008 Sunderland
26 February 2009 London]]> Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:22:13 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=39#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=38 I believe a lot of problems in our society are caused by adults not taking responsibility for their own actions and setting a poor example to our young generation. When the media reports some of the ‘shock’ stories we have become all too familiar with, one can be forgiven for feeling a sense of isolation – thinking the rest of the world has gone mad.
However, events like these help to reaffirm that there are like-minded people out there and we can discuss possible action to combat problems. It is particularly important for young people to be given this platform, in order that they can develop the confidence to extend their circle of influence; these initial ripples can grow into waves of positive action.
It was a breath of fresh air to see and hear such common-sense. The tragedy was that, despite being invited, there were no representatives of the news media present. Shameful, really, though I guess good news stories are less attractive to them. When I talk about setting a good example, I think it about time that journalists understood that they are not exempt from that!]]> Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:24:01 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=38#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=37 As ever, the event continues to surpass what one might reasonably expect from a body that is relatively small in size. However, it may be small in body but, it is mighty in heart. Not better illustrated by the immense Performance Awards dinner, which is the culmination of the week.
Very well-done, of course, to all the winners! Tremendous congratulations must also go to the event organisers and to all those short-listed for the awards. Our field of business is well-served by you all.]]> Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:10:54 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=37#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=36 If you are one of them, can I suggest that you look the word ‘average’ up in the dictionary? You might find the answer useful. It will just go to show that paying a little attention at school can prove useful in the real world!]]> Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:48:07 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=36#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=35 Nearly a year later and nothing changes. Not so long ago, confidential papers were found on a train; last week a memory stick containing classified data was lost; today we have news of file papers, relating to a drugs trial, being found on a rubbish tip. This puts at risk the witnesses and police officers involved.
Once again, I feel compelled to point out that, in my opinion, this is all symptomatic of a lack of leadership. Effective leadership breeds a confidence and a determination to do the right thing. Without it, people become disinterested, disrespectful and they disregard due processes; mistakes happen.
If you would like to read more about ‘doing the right thing’, please purchase my latest book: The phat Controller (A Leadership Handbook)]]> Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:02:36 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=35#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=34 After years of lottery funding into sports, as a nation we can now see tangible rewards in the form of very successful results at the Beijing Olympics. As usual, we are met with a wave of negativity suggesting that the lottery money should not be spent on, so-called, elitist sports and would be better spent on providing more hospitals, funding to prop-up business etc. It cannot be argued that fundamentally that is wrong. However, we always have to look at the bigger picture. Our economy cannot survive without foreign investment in business and, like it or not, the way in which we fare in competitive international sporting environments is used as an assessment of our ability to generate a dynamic workforce, to attract those investors. Achievement in the Olympics is a necessity.
On top of which, the impact of successes such as Dame Kelly Holmes in Athens four years ago, Rebecca Adlington in Beijing, and the truly remarkable story of Rebecca Romero at both events, as a source of immense inspiration to people in all walks of life is simply immeasurable.
To those people who are struggling to see the value I would ask, “What are we to do?” Is the expectation that we simply give up trying to be successful at sport? By generating the ‘feel-good’ factor and inspiring people to have an interest, and maybe even take-up a sport has a knock-on effect across our society – healthier, active, people will be more energised, more successful, less sick and will turn into positive role-models for future generations…..which is so sadly lacking at the moment.
Open your eyes…..we need to give our children a vision of what can be!]]> Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:26:07 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=34#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=33 The phat Controller (A Leadership Handbook) has now been published and is available for sale. Please click on the following link to take you to its web-page on the publisher's web-site:
The phat Controller (A Leadership Handbook)]]> Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:33:10 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=33#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=32 On 1st April 2004, ‘benefit periods’ were abolished for Housing and Council Tax benefits. This was the regulation which restricted the length of time that a benefit could be in payment without a formal review. Since then, despite some risk-based reviews being undertaken, a benefit could in theory have continued un-checked, reliant on claimants reporting any change of circumstances. It, therefore, doesn’t take a brain surgeon to work out what may be happening, especially when faced with the facts that in just the first two years since ‘benefit periods’ ended the figure for error in the system had doubled.
In order to ensure that claimants do not ‘forget’, it is now being suggested that claimants should be written to after 6 months to remind them of the need to report changes of circumstance. Mmm, that’ll work !! They may as well just re-introduce benefit periods !]]> Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:41:10 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=32#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=31 Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:43:51 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=31#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=30 I fully understand his distress at losing in Moscow and that he would have had to pull himself together for the international match against the USA, but ‘brave’ ? Don’t make me laugh !
It’s football, not war. However, today we have news of an event that really is bravery personified. This was not war, either. But, you have to take your hat off to the immense courage shown by Carol Saldinack. This is the lady who reported her sons to the Police for carrying out a vicious attack on a man, which left him blind in one eye; and resulted in them serving a prison sentence.
Any parents putting themselves in Mrs. Saldinack’s shoes will understand just how brave she has been. Nuff said - Respect !
]]> Fri, 30 May 2008 22:41:45 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=30#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=29 Cricket is a Strange Animal]]> Thu, 15 May 2008 15:23:30 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=29#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=28 The cowardly murder of 16-year-old Jimmy Mizen in a bakery in South London on Saturday angers me to the point of rage. I am an advocate of each and every one of us taking responsibility for what transpires in society but, Jimmy’s death should surely act as a catalyst. This is now a time for our leader to stand up, grasp the nettle and show some mettle.
Tell us what the government are going to do to protect those that they serve; tell us what they are going to do to protect victims of crime; tell us what they are going to do to rid the streets of the guns and knives; tell us what they are going to do to catch these criminals; tell us what they are going to do to start properly punishing these criminals; tell us what they are going to do to start ensuring that these sorts of crimes become less prevalent.
I am happy to play my part, as I’m sure are many others. I want to begin feeling that somebody in a position of power is taking it seriously, though; because I don’t at the moment. I am sick and tired of the lack of respect shown to others and the ‘you can’t tell me what to do’ mentality displayed by some of these scum. The fact is that we have failed as a society when we are resorting to ‘telling’ people what to do most of the time.
You have to start somewhere, which is true. I also have a few suggestions as to where they might start – for instance, I remain to be convinced otherwise that violent video games do not contribute to this escalation in violence. Some of these people are probably too thick to realise that just because one of CJ’s victims is back on his feet the next day when they log-on, it doesn’t work like that in real life !
But, the real answer is people in positions of trust and authority – MP’s and teachers for example – and, most importantly, parents taking the responsibility to show people from a very early age how to behave. It simply isn’t happening enough !
And, Mr. Brown, I am not inclined to give you my vote at the moment but, one thing is for certain, if you were able to demonstrate to me that you were going to tackle this head-on with real conviction, not just election-talk to win my vote, then this issue more than any other would influence where I put my cross. I suspect that many others would agree too !]]> Mon, 12 May 2008 12:06:00 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=28#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=27 Several Local Authorities (LA’s) were involved in the pilot projects and, they have proved so successful that, the Government has today announced further funding for another 15 pilots to be undertaken.
At the outset, concern had been expressed in some quarters that this scheme may have the effect of discouraging some genuine claimants from applying for benefit. Reports from my colleagues across the country suggest not and, in fact, it is proving to be a very useful tool in not only identifying potential fraudsters but, getting payment to those genuine claimants much quicker.
So, every one’s a winner and, once again, proof that you may never know the real advantages of something until you try it!]]> Wed, 07 May 2008 16:40:24 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=27#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=26 Take Lewis Hamilton, for example. Last year, he was the greatest thing since sliced bread – a wonderful start to his racing career and clearly a great prospect. This year, after only 3 races (the first of which was still a win !) the media are beginning to question his credentials. Quite staggering; and I am pleased to see that he began to answer some of those critics with his 3rd place at the weekend.
I have written in this column before about how negative we are about the 2012 Olympics. Why is it so difficult to see what a massive positive boost that event can bring to this country on numerous fronts ? Yes, there is a cost but, nothing is for free in this world.
The other issue is that of employing overseas players in team sports, at the expense of home-grown talent. This issue has been well-documented with regards to the footballers in the Premier League, with something like only 30% of players being English.
However, I think we have plunged to new depths today in English County Cricket. Whereas, I was pleased to note, Yorkshire took the field last week with 8 players who had progressed through their own Academy; Leicestershire have taken the field today in Birmingham with 6 players born in South Africa and 1 born in Australia.
Now, even putting aside the Kolpak ruling and players wishing to re-nationalise themselves and qualify for England - as did Kevin Pietersen let’s not forget - I still think Leicestershire’s team today is a sad indictment of the state of sport in this country.]]> Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:04:54 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=26#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=25 What is worrying is that that they are so right. The ignorance of the general public is almost breathtaking at times. Consider this.
Many young people think nothing of spending in the region of, say, £60/night drinking, in and out of clubs/bars, rides in taxis etc. They maybe do that twice a week. So, in an average month they spend nearly £500 on such activities. Yet, some of those same people will complain bitterly about paying just £100/month in Council Tax – money that goes towards ensuring that the clubs and bars that they drink in are safe and hygienic; towards regulating the taxis that ferry them around; towards freeing the streets of the litter (and vomit) that they leave behind; towards funding the police force, on which they will call, if there is any trouble. And that is not to mention all the other services provided by their local authorities, such as Education, Libraries, Fire Service etc. I think we may have got things slightly out of proportion somewhere along the way !
I have for many years, now, argued that we are not educating our young people sufficiently well in how important local government is and, particularly, how important it is that local taxes, i.e. Council Tax and Business Rates, are paid promptly by all. Whilst the modern trend is to look to blame someone else, I urge local government itself to grasp the nettle and start to be more proactive; after all, it is itself responsible for delivering education ! Whilst it does not sit easily with me that I find myself agreeing with an accused terrorist, should we not be heeding such a valuable lesson ?]]> Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:52:09 +0100 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=25#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=24 What on Earth has led you to be so deluded that you thought you deserved more than the £24.3m you have been awarded ? My heart bleeds. It is a sickening testimony to the greediness of the Human Race. And all this on a day when the global financial crisis bites hard and we stand on the verge of many, many hard working people losing their homes.
Can I suggest that you now shut up, and go and look the word ‘dignity’ up in the dictionary ?]]> Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:54:02 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=24#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=23 click here]]> Sat, 01 Mar 2008 14:23:53 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=23#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=22 The programme featured a recent episode of ‘Freaky Eaters’ about BBC Radio presenter Chris Hawkins, who is afraid, yes afraid, of fruit and vegetables. I have never heard anything so ridiculous in all my life. Actually, come to think of it, I have. Only last week, we were treated to the news that Graham Calvert was suing William Hills for allowing him to run up debts of £2m.
Why do we allow people like this to have air time ? Why do we get taken in by such set-up programmes like Wife Swap and Holiday Showdown ? Why is tax-payers money being wasted by allowing foolish actions like Calvert's into the justice system ? The judiciary should take one look and tell him to go away and grow up !
So, I’ve decided to vent my frustration by starting my own movement – CRAPDADA (Crush Radio And Prevent Discrimination Against Deaf Audiences) !]]> Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:56:05 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=22#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=21 By signing the letter of invitation, it is he who thereafter takes responsibility, whoever’s idea it was. After God knows how many years in office, he damn well knows that. It is laughable that attempts are made to dupe the public in a desperate bid to save face. Have a bit of back-bone, man, and just admit your error of judgement; your credibility will increase.]]> Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:15:48 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=21#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=19 Football is, for the most part, very boring. Do you remember last season’s FA Cup Final between Chelsea and Manchester United ? How dull was that ? Apart from supporting your own team, people watch the sport – including me, I hasten to add – because occasionally you witness something exciting (e.g. Liverpool’s unbelievable come-back in the 2005 Champions League Final); something exceptional (e.g. Cristiano Ronaldo’s recent free-kick against Portsmouth) or something explosive (e.g. Cameroon’s Andre Bikey astonishingly assaulting a medical official). Apart from that the ‘product’ served up by overpaid, postulating, prima-donnas is pretty dire.
Compare that to Rugby League’s Super League, where you have athletes going hammer-and-tong at each other in 80 minutes of non-stop entertainment for the spectator. Sometimes it is difficult to recall all the incidents in a game, as there are so many. It is interesting to note, therefore, that here we have a sport that is continually changing its rules and regulations to make the ‘product’ even more exciting for the observer. This now includes playing an extra fixture each year in Cardiff; an experiment that has proven very successful. Everyone involved realises that unless you go forward, you go backwards…….there is no standing still. No pathetic whingeing from the fans about losing the soul of the sport etc. etc. No moaning that playing this 'odd' game may cause relegation. Yes, it might but, guess what, life is not perfect ! I speak as a Castleford Tigers fan, who suffered relegation when we didn't even finish bottom. The sport is bigger than one club !
OK, so Cardiff is not the same as going to the Far East but, the status of both sports is on a different level, too. Football fans surely have to realise that unless changes are made, on and off the pitch, their precious game will die. And all this diatribe about not being able to watch their team play, if they go to Manila……what tosh ! I have just witnessed on the television Aston Villa fans booing because the opposition were keeping the ball from their team in a very high quality exchange of passes. This demonstrates very clearly that football fans are not interested in watching the ‘game’, they are only interested in the result. So, whether their team win in Birmingham, Barnsley or Beijing, they wouldn’t really care.]]> Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:54:55 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=19#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=18 Yesterday, in the wake of Garry Newlove being kicked to death in Warrington, we discover that one of his killers was only released from custody two days earlier, one of his bail conditions being that he did not go to Warrington.
Today, it emerges that Joshua Karney, Britain’s most wanted sex offender, was released by South Yorkshire Police in November, because they didn’t know who he was.
Well, all I can say is, let’s hope that Osama Bin Laden doesn’t find himself in our police cells at the weekend. Otherwise, that semtex in his pocket (for which he has no receipt) may get confiscated, and he’ll be sent on his way with a quiet word about not nicking plasticine !]]> Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:55:10 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=18#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=17 Reports in the last couple of days suggest that bankruptcies in the UK are set to rocket over the coming months. Sad ? Yes. But, in this morning’s news, it is estimated that 5million days will be lost to business today through sickness. You do not need to be Einstein to recognise that there may be a link there.
With so many work-shy people about, it is not surprising that businesses will go to the wall and, what is so depressing, is that many do not see that their financial ruin is attributable to their own inability to get out of bed and do a good days work. If you are one of these people, then shame on you !
So, why are they (allegedly) sick ? My guess is that they got so drunk on New Years Eve that they spent New Years Day in bed and then feel cheated that they’ve lost a day, so throw a ‘sickie’. Pathetic……..and it is about time they realised that they are. Unfortunately, we live in a society that applauds such moronic behaviour. Getting drunk is part of the fabric of that society and I’m tired of it.
Television constantly portrays the image of a quick stiff drink as a remedy to stress. Why do we allow ourselves to be deluded ? Drink is never the solution and, more often than not, the problem ! Ricky Hatton allegedly goes out on a 57-pint bender and is lauded as some kind of hero. I don’t think so. That is totally irresponsible and, let’s be honest, completely unjustifiable. A great example to set, Ricky,….not !!
Now, if you think this is nothing more than a ‘holier-than-thou’ attack on the common-man, think again. As someone that enjoys the odd drink I am not an advocate of tee-totallism but, I do think it is time that responsible citizens fought back against this media-fuelled celebration of everything alcohol-related.
In conclusion, I would like to ask business leaders if you think you are demonstrating the type of leadership which will inspire people to get out of bed and into work ? I very much doubt it. People have more choice now; so, if you want commitment you have to earn it.
I heard one business-man on the radio this evening talking about exacting sweet revenge on these slackers. I do understand his frustration but, I’m afraid to say, it is a mis-placed rhetoric. You reap what you sow. If you are one of those that perpetuates this Victorian ‘them and us’ environment; then shame on you !]]> Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:53:43 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=17#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=16 I hope you have a wonderful time over the next few days and that 2008 turns out to be all that you hope it would be. My wish ? The return of Leeds United's 15 points would be simply perfect.
Best wishes, Sean.]]> Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:05:18 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=16#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=15 Certainly, it is all relative but, I think we in this country stand on the precipice. In order to succeed in governing a happy, vibrant, well-educated, orderly and healthy country, the backbone needs to be strong. That backbone is made up of such critical occupations as teachers, doctors, nurses, police officers, fire-fighters etc. It is essential that they are looked after.
I, for one, would not object to a few pence being added to my tax bill, to ensure that the body of workers to which I have just referred are given a fair deal. I know that market forces will determine many outcomes but, I find it totally impalatable that our police force is denied a small back-date in a pay-rise just to ‘keep inflation in check’. And this in a week when a new England manager is appointed on, reputedly, £6.5m a year, just to organise another group of millionaires to kick a pig’s bladder around a patch of grass.
I think we have lost perspective somewhere along the way !]]> Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:49:45 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=15#comment http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=14 It seems to me to be largely constructive and supportive of the much good work done by local authorities in difficult circumstances. One conclusion that it draws centres upon leadership – something that I have touched upon in previous blogs (see below).
Recognising that there is no direct correlation between specific leadership styles and performance, effective leadership requires a balance of appropriate styles, the report rightly acknowledges that soft ‘issues’ such as organisational culture and motivation could have a significant impact on performance.
Indeed. Something that I have discussed at length in my forthcoming book on the subject of leadership. Watch this page for further news.]]> Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:12:47 +0000 http://www.seanlangley.co.uk/index.php?number=14#comment